Tag Archives: Bill Clinton

Remember the good ol’ days?


Some wonderfully imagined art by Jason Heuser, who can be found at his DeviantArt page here.

Pay attention to the background detail on this one…who is that with the rocket launcher?

Click Read More below for a bonus image.

Read More


In a compelling and hypnotically well-written article in this month’s Esquire magazine, John Richardson valiantly argues against the artificial societal restraints put on sexual activity in modern, supposedly-“civilized” society, and in favor of true sexual liberation.

I want to suggest that sex, be it adulterous or premarital or deviant or polyamorous, is a good thing, not a bad thing, and that sex itself is the moment of grace. And that our sterile idea of perfection is the actual sin. To start with the subject on the table, adultery is a brave rebellion against the invisible prison we build for ourselves. When the sad little man Larry Craig widened his stance in that airport bathroom, it was probably the most honest and courageous act of his life. When Clinton got that blowjob in the White House, he wasn’t indulging a weakness (and an eager intern) but enacting the hero’s journey of reconciling inner and outer, risking all to break through the wall of hypocritical purity he had spent years building and projecting to the world in the effort to get elected. By risking martyrdom, in fact, he lifted himself up into an exaltation we still refuse to understand. He was the Martyred Jesus of Oral Sex with Interns and all we see is a mean little sin, as all the sexual deviates pretending to be puritans gathered around in an orgy of denunciation and scandal. In our condemnation, we focus on the supposedly broken vows and the supposed pain of his wife when in fact we know nothing of his wife’s true feelings or her knowledge and tolerance of his “frisky” side (frisky being one of the endless array of demeaning expressions we use as invisible prison bars, along with dog and pig and you only want one thing). We never consider that our reaction is the punishment and the meanness is all in our eyes. Every single time we play out this ritual, we replay the Old Testament rite in which the pious transferred their sins to goats, which were then driven into the wilderness, just as we drive David Petraeus and a parade of other scapegoats out the gates of our smug little village of lies in the hope that we can put the “sin” outside the gate — when it is, of course, always inside. That’s what happens when you put up gates.

In perhaps his most shrewd and astute passage – and one of the most sagacious passages I’ve ever read anywhere, on any subject – Richardson continues:

What we’re afraid of is the truth. We live in a world in which men and women are buried up to their necks and stoned to death for these same impulses. We recoil at such barbarism with smug assertions of our superior level of civilization while cheerfully meting out our own version of punishment for the same supposed crime — anything to avoid looking at the deeper questions of why adultery exists and what exactly all our endless sexual prohibitions and inhibitions are supposed to do for us. Because if they are there to stabilize the family or inhibit sexually compulsive perversions or avoid the conflicts attendant in jealousy, they’re failing spectacularly and they always have.

He does spend some column inches arguing in favor of adultery – not promoting it necessarily, but arguing for its acceptance as an inevitable corollary to the social strictures we’ve created in the institution of monogamous marriage, and that for a cheating husband we have only ourselves and human nature to blame – and that, I have to say, is a tough nut to crack. The presence of such an argument might make it difficult for some readers to get behind his treatise here, myself included. But in confronting us with the darker, animalistic side of our nature, particularly at a time when we are celebrating and relishing in our civilization and patriotic xeno-supremacy like never before, Richardson’s assertions are both challenging and helpful – even healthy, I think – to consider. With his writing, he lays out his argument with a beautiful intuitiveness that makes perfect and complete sense while being dissonant to what we thought we knew, and, at times, somewhat despicable. I dare you to read it.

Read More

US Secretary of State Clinton gestures during a news conference after the meeting of the Action Group on Syria at the United Nations European headquarters in GenevaToday on Hardball with Chris Matthews, a topic flying through the political news-ether that snagged on the sharp outcropping of Matthews’s rundown was the possibility of Hillary Clinton running for president. The commentators seemed to think she would, eventually, come around to it, which jells with everything else I’ve been hearing, and which I think will make for an eminently interesting election season in a few short years.

Though I wouldn’t have voted for her in 2008, I think I would in 2016. I also think she has a good chance of doing well, thanks to three factors. One, she starts with a large amount of goodwill, which she had in 2008, partly due to her own gravitas, and partly, I imagine, carried over from her husband’s administration and the way she handled his philandering (and perhaps a certain amount of that may be pity, or at least relatability disguised as pity, and in turn disguised as support and enthusiasm). Two, Bill has transformed over the past four years from a weakness into a strength. A behind-the-scenes account says in 2008 Bill was seen by Hillaryland as a huge liability, for a variety of reasons, and was thus kept out of the spotlight. Now, however, the Former Philanderer has drastically improved his image, the Obama campaign serving as his political rehab. In July 2012, his approval rating hit 66 percent, an impressive peak at the time, and then on September 5th, the day of his expectation-exceeding convention-revitalizing speech – which did a lot for Clinton on its own, winning him the mantle of not only best convention speech, but highest approval rating of the convention – his approval hit a peak of 69 percent. Second place went to Michelle Obama with 65, and the president came in third with 53. In October, Esquire magazine released polling information on a hypothetical race between Clinton and Romney – among other things – in which Clinton thoroughly trounced the actual Republican nominee, 65 percent to a tragic 30. So Bill has obviously gained back some of his previous clout, which would undoubtedly serve Hillary well (he could pull through at last-minute campaign events, as he did for Obama in the final weeks of the race).

And three – and most importantly – Hillary has proven herself with four years of phenomenal job performance as Secretary of State, particularly in taking the blame for security in Benghazi. It is number three that has most swayed my opinion, and as of right now, I’d have no problem giving her support in a primary, or a general.

John Hively's Blog: News and Analysis of the War Against the Middle Class

By The World's Most Accurate Economic Forecaster Since 1989.

Digestible Politics

Politics Made Easy!

The PEEL Literary Arts Magazine

your voice. your vision.

the first casualty.

irregular digressions into politics, media, and tech

The Secular Jurist

Social commentary from a perspective of moral secularism

TED Blog

The TED Blog shares interesting news about TED, TED Talks video, the TED Prize and more.

Regaining the Center

Commentary on the Politics of Division


Ending government prohibition on guns and drugs.

The Political Equation

The intersection of data and intuition